Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | - | - | 1% | 31% | 68% |
2 | CHENG Thomas | - | 1% | 9% | 52% | 38% |
3 | HABALA Peter | - | - | - | - | 100% |
3 | LEE David S. | 10% | 41% | 42% | 6% | - |
5 | MONES jesse | 7% | 43% | 40% | 9% | < 1% |
6 | BROWN Jason | 28% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - |
7 | RUSANOV Oleg | 21% | 47% | 27% | 4% | - |
8 | TOMASI John | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - |
9 | LEE John K. | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 42% |
10 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 5% | 28% | 45% | 21% | - |
11 | BASS Nathan | 1% | 17% | 46% | 35% | 1% |
12 | KUO Chris C. | 36% | 46% | 16% | 1% | - |
13 | HOLCOMB Michael | 54% | 38% | 8% | - | - |
14 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | - |
15 | NELSON Kristofer | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.