Minneapolis, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SUAREZ Rafael A. | V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 2 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | OLIVARES Frets G. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | CHILTON Ken | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | FELDMAN Adam | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 7 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | D V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | CHO Michael | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | NORMILE Jon M. | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | POPOKH Leo | V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 13 | KOEHN Ted | V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 14 | LEYLAND John | V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 15 | WAY Kashi M. | D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 16 | VALENTINE Iain | D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 17 | POWERS Douglas A. | V V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | ISSA Naoum P. | D V V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 19 | FADL Omar | D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | NIEMIEC Mark | V D V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 21 | KRYLTSOV Greg | V D D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 21 | SUAREZ Rolando | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 23 | GALLUCH Peter G. | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 24 | SCHOENACK Jason A. | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 25 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 27 | GRISWOLD Doug | D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 28 | BERGER Jamie | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 29 | NEWELL Tim | D V D D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 30 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | TOWSTER Robert | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 32 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 34 | CLAUSEN Matthew J. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 35 | NEAS Derek | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 36 | WEMPLE Charles | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.