Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SUAREZ Rafael A. | - | - | - | 1% | 23% | 76% |
| 2 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 56% |
| 3 | OLIVARES Frets G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 48% | 35% |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | 3% | 40% | 56% |
| 5 | CHILTON Ken | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| 6 | FELDMAN Adam | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 40% |
| 7 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | - | - | - | 9% | 58% | 32% |
| 8 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | 7% | 39% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | 4% | 28% | 56% | 12% |
| 10 | CHO Michael | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 30% |
| 11 | NORMILE Jon M. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 47% | 14% |
| 12 | POPOKH Leo | - | - | 3% | 23% | 49% | 25% |
| 13 | KOEHN Ted | - | - | 3% | 22% | 55% | 20% |
| 14 | LEYLAND John | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 15 | WAY Kashi M. | - | 3% | 23% | 60% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | VALENTINE Iain | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | POWERS Douglas A. | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | ISSA Naoum P. | 6% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 19 | FADL Omar | - | 5% | 29% | 48% | 17% | 1% |
| 20 | NIEMIEC Mark | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 39% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | SUAREZ Rolando | 3% | 24% | 47% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 23 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 17% | 47% | 32% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | SCHOENACK Jason A. | 1% | 62% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 25 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 23% | 50% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | 4% | 32% | 45% | 16% | 1% |
| 27 | GRISWOLD Doug | 2% | 18% | 44% | 33% | 3% | - |
| 28 | BERGER Jamie | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | NEWELL Tim | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 30 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 31 | TOWSTER Robert | 21% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | 12% | 45% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 13% | 49% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 34 | CLAUSEN Matthew J. | 12% | 44% | 39% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | NEAS Derek | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WEMPLE Charles | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.