Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% |
| 2 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 3 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 3 | KETTELLE Molly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 5 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 6 | LAMBERT Mahala | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 61% |
| 7 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 8 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 9% |
| 9 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 10 | KO Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 13 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 15 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 16 | MU Allison | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 17 | LIU Siyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 18 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 19 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 20 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 21 | VAUGHAN Norah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 2% |
| 22 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 23 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 24 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | UNGERER Frieda | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | COKER Bettina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 27 | DO Leila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 28 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 16% | 1% | |
| 29 | ZHUANG Christina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 30 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 34 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 35 | SUH Kailey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 36 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
| 37 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 37 | PARK Leah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 39 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 40 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 42 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | MICHAELSEN Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | |
| 44 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 45 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 46 | SUN Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 47 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | SULTER Aurelie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 50 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 51 | NUNLEY Victoria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 51 | SETHRE Traci | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 53 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 54 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 55 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 56 | WEI Angela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 57 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 60 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 61 | LEE emily | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 62 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 63 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 64 | KUNDU TRISHA | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 66 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 67 | MORALES Paulina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | LONG Madeline M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 19% | |
| 69 | HERNANDEZ Melany | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 98% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 71 | HAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 72 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 73 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 74 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% |
| 75 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 76 | FULIGNI Isabella | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 77 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | GREENLEAF Ella | 100% | 93% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | NEWMAN Ariel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 81 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 82 | NORTH Zoe M. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 83 | BRUSH Sydney | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | SA Milla | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | ROMERO Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 86 | ROLOFF Katarina M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 87 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 87 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 98% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | LIU Lucy | 100% | 70% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 90 | STONE Colleen R. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 91 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 92 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 93 | YIM Rachael | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 94 | SHELARE Mehal | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 95 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 96 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 97 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 98 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 98 | MCLAURIN Semini | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 100 | NELSON Gwendolyn H. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 100 | YOUNG Abigail | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 102 | ZHAO Aimee | 100% | 67% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 103 | OWINGS Anna | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | JOHNSON Maya | 100% | 98% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 105 | KLINE Rachel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 106 | WANG Kelsey | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 107 | DURR Strahlia Devi | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 108 | TOMASI Samantha | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 109 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 110 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 111 | BABB Cicely | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 112 | BURTON Sequoia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 113 | MADSEN Lindsey | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 114 | BROCE Lilianna | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 115 | HOLCOMB Emily | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 116 | PAULSEN Amy | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 116 | GADIYARAM Sushama | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 118 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 119 | WIDMANN Ceili | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 119 | UNGLAUB Emma | 100% | 95% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 119 | CRANFILL Madison | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 122 | SAUCEDO Fernanda | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.