Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% | |
| 2 | JUNG Irene | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 3 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
| 3 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 5 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 6 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 7 | HILD Nisha | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 8 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | YODER Bridget H. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 10 | BILILIES Sophia | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | XI Shining | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 12 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% | |
| 13 | SADIK HANA | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 14 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 15 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 17 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 18 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 19 | SPRINGER Ella | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 20 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | HE Charlotte | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 22 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 23 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | JEONG Katie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 26 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 27 | NI Sharon | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | HUNG Anna | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 31 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | COLTER Aurora | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 35 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 36 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 37 | CHOWDHURY Ranlyn | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | ZENG Megan | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 42 | NGUYEN Siena | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | XIKES Katherine E. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 44 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 44 | DAVIS Charlotte | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | JEAN Olympe G. | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | SUN Alyssa | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 48 | LIN Nicole | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | YANG Lea | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | CHIN Elise | 2% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | LUKER Sophia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 52 | MACE Eliza M. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 53 | LIM Jaslene | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | DENG Brooke | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 55 | EVANS Madelynn | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 57 | NOVICK Mia J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 59 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | YUAN Greta | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% | |
| 62 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | ROBINSON Stella | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | LEE Sophia | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 65 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 67 | GRULICH Rayaana | 20% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | LIM Jovine | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | FAN Grace | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | SCOTT Eve | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | RODGERS Rachel | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.