Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 2 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
| 3 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 3 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% | |
| 5 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 6 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 7 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
| 8 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 10 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 12 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 13 | SADIK HANA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 14 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 15 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
| 17 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | |
| 18 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 19 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 20 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 22 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 23 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 26 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | NI Sharon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 35 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 36 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 37 | CHOWDHURY Ranlyn | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 40 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 41 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 42 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 44 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 44 | DAVIS Charlotte | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 47 | SUN Alyssa | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 48 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | YANG Lea | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 98% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | MACE Eliza M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 53 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 55 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 57 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 59 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 61 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
| 62 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | ROBINSON Stella | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 65 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 67 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | LIM Jovine | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | FAN Grace | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | RODGERS Rachel | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.