Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 2 | YOU Emily | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 3 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 3 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 5 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 6 | SONG Angela | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 7 | WEISS Olivia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 8 | YOU Isabel B. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 9 | KIM Jayna | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 10 | HICKS Grace | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | BHATT Anisha | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 13 | BURN Lauren M. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 14 | FLANIGAN KENDRA | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | LI Alisha | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 16 | BUSH Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 17 | TAN Jocelyn | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 18 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 19 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 20 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 21 | GUJJA Misha | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 22 | GAO Judy | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 23 | SHU Youshan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 24 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 25 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 26 | ZENG Katrina | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 28 | LEE Yedda | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 29 | BREKSA Lydia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ANDERSON Claire | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 32 | FREEMAN Kate | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 34 | LIN Ashley | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | XU Katelyn | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 37 | SPURLIN Alicen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 38 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 39 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 40 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 42 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 43 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 44 | SINHA Zara | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 45 | PECK Maia A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 46 | BENNETT Olivia | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | YAO Yilin | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 48 | BOTNER Olivia | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 49 | LI Charlotte | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | NELSON Grace E. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | BARBARA Camille | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 52 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 53 | MIINEA Elena | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 54 | SHICK Klaudia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 55 | HSIU Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 56 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 57 | GULLY Wren | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 59 | DRYSDALE Lita | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 60 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | CAREY Michele S. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 62 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | PULLEN Ayah | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 64 | JACKSON Viktoria | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | DALEY Keira | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 66 | ZHU-HILL Alice A. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 67 | PARKS Eliana | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | PATIL Amulya | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 69 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 70 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 71 | PEELER Julia | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 72 | WIDMANN Ceili | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | GROSSL Karina | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 74 | NEELAM Neha | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 75 | PEARSON Heila | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 76 | LI Fei | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 77 | LEE Olivia | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 78 | LEWIS Rachel | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 79 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 79 | LEE Samantha X. | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 82 | SEUK Irene | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 83 | BLIN Margaux J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 84 | DONGES Anna | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 85 | ROWLAND May | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 86 | CHIEM Karen | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 87 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 87 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | MESCHIA Maggie | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 90 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 91 | MADRID Maureen | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 92 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 93 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 94 | MACEDON Gianna | 1% | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 95 | JHANGIANI KAVYA | - | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 95 | CABANIS eliza | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 97 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | ENGLISH Marli | 4% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | CHOI Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
| 100 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | MARTIN Adriana | 10% | 47% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | DONDISCH Andrea | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 103 | KIZILBASH Zara | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | |
| 104 | KUMAR Anusha | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 105 | STONER Shanrael M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 106 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 107 | KANEVSKY Samantha | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 108 | DOERR Zoe | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 109 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 110 | POON Desiree | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 111 | JARUSHI Amnee | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 112 | CHANG Abigail | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 113 | XU Priscilla | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 114 | CARLSON Ava | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 115 | BYRON Karen J. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 116 | SATO Elyse | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 117 | PROKOPEAS Grace | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 118 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 119 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 120 | YOU Joyce | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 121 | RHEA Heather | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 122 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 122 | HALM Alexandra F. | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 124 | MA Katelyn | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 125 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 126 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 48% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 127 | MAY Courtney | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.