Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
2 | YOU Emily | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 8% | |
3 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
3 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
5 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
6 | SONG Angela | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
7 | WEISS Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
8 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
9 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
10 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
11 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 3% | < 1% | - |
12 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
13 | BURN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
14 | FLANIGAN KENDRA | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
15 | LI Alisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
16 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
17 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
18 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
19 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 29% |
20 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
21 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
22 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
23 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
24 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% | |
25 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
26 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
27 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
28 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
29 | BREKSA Lydia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
30 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
31 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
32 | FREEMAN Kate | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
33 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
34 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
35 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
36 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
37 | SPURLIN Alicen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
38 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 23% |
39 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
40 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
41 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
42 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
43 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
44 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
45 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
46 | BENNETT Olivia | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
48 | BOTNER Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
49 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
50 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
51 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
52 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
53 | MIINEA Elena | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
54 | SHICK Klaudia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
55 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | |
56 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
57 | GULLY Wren | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | |
59 | DRYSDALE Lita | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
60 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 100% | 70% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
61 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% |
62 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
63 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
64 | JACKSON Viktoria | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
65 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
66 | ZHU-HILL Alice A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
67 | PARKS Eliana | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
68 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
69 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
70 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
71 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
72 | WIDMANN Ceili | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
73 | GROSSL Karina | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
74 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
75 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
76 | LI Fei | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
77 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
78 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
79 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
79 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
81 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
82 | SEUK Irene | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
83 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
84 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
85 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
86 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
87 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
87 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
89 | MESCHIA Maggie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
90 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
91 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
92 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
93 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
94 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
95 | JHANGIANI KAVYA | 100% | 100% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
95 | CABANIS eliza | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
97 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
98 | ENGLISH Marli | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
99 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
100 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
100 | MARTIN Adriana | 100% | 90% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
102 | DONDISCH Andrea | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
103 | KIZILBASH Zara | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | |
104 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
105 | STONER Shanrael M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
106 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
107 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
108 | DOERR Zoe | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 3% |
109 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
110 | POON Desiree | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
111 | JARUSHI Amnee | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
112 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
113 | XU Priscilla | 100% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
114 | CARLSON Ava | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
115 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
116 | SATO Elyse | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
117 | PROKOPEAS Grace | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
118 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
119 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
120 | YOU Joyce | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
121 | RHEA Heather | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | |
122 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
122 | HALM Alexandra F. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
124 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
125 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
126 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
127 | MAY Courtney | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.