New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 2 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 3 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 3 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
| 5 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 24% | ||
| 7 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | SINHA Anika | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 10 | PAUL Lila | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 11 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 12 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 13 | LI Jaimie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 15 | PASHIN Anna | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | HILD Nisha | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | ||
| 19 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 20 | LU Elaine | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | LI Sophie | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 22 | MCKEE Ainsley | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | ||
| 23 | JAVERI Amaya | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | NAYAK Indra | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG Caroline | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | FEIG Sela | 6% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 29 | NAYAK Anika | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | YOUNG Audrey | < 1% | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 33 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 34 | NATH Trisha | 11% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | WU Allison Y. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MCKEE Brynnley | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KHAN Alissa | 8% | 37% | 42% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 38 | GUILFOYLE Alanna | 14% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | NAYAK Esha | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.