New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Amanda C. | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 2 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 3 | SOURIMTO Valeria | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 7 | MIKA Veronica | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | SINHA Anika | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 9 | OBRADOVIC Ana | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | PAUL Lila | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | SO Catelyn | V D V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 12 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | D D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 13 | LI Jaimie | V V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | PASHIN Anna | D D V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | LEE Sophia | V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 17 | HILD Nisha | V V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | LAMMER Sophie G. | D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 19 | MANSPERGER Leena | V V D V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 20 | LU Elaine | V V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | LI Sophie | V V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | MCKEE Ainsley | V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 23 | JAVERI Amaya | V V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | D D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | NAYAK Indra | V D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 27 | HUANG Caroline | V V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 28 | FEIG Sela | D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | NAYAK Anika | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | D V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | YOUNG Audrey | D D D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 33 | MONTORIO Lily M. | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | NATH Trisha | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | WU Allison Y. | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 36 | MCKEE Brynnley | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | KHAN Alissa | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 38 | GUILFOYLE Alanna | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 39 | NAYAK Esha | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.