Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
2 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
3 | GHAYALOD Ansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
3 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
5 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
6 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
7 | REN Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
8 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
9 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
10 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
11 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
12 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
13 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
14 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
15 | LUO George F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
16 | XUE ALEXANDER | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
17 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
18 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 17% | |
19 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
20 | XU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
21 | CORTEZ Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
22 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
23 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
24 | GUAN Luke | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
25 | KIM Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
26 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
27 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
28 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
29 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
30 | PI Alexander | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
31 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
32 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
33 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
34 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
34 | LO Konnor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
36 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
37 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
38 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
39 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
40 | GOLDIN Lucca | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
41 | BEITEL Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
42 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
43 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
44 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
45 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 20% | |
46 | CHEEMA Hyder | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
46 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
48 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
49 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
49 | PAN Alex | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
51 | REBELLO Derek | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
52 | LO Bradley | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
53 | YOU Jaden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
54 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
55 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
56 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 6% | |
57 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
58 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
59 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
60 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
61 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
62 | VENU Ram | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
63 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
64 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
65 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
66 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
67 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
68 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
69 | HAN Edward | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
70 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
71 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
72 | HENRY Dillon P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
73 | ROE Finnegan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
74 | GRIFFITH Joseph | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
75 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
76 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
77 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
78 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
79 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
80 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
81 | MOL Spencer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
82 | LIN Nick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
83 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
83 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
85 | FENKER William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
86 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
87 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
88 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
89 | HU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
90 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
91 | GREENE Cameron J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
91 | AKS Ari | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
91 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
94 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
95 | CRAIG Samuel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
96 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
96 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
98 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
99 | ELLS Edward | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
100 | HERNANDEZ Stanton | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
101 | WU Yiyang | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
102 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
103 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
104 | RODGERS Jacob | 100% | 74% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
105 | YAN Leonard Z. | 100% | 97% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
106 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
107 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
108 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
109 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
110 | STERN Tobias | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
111 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
112 | HOOLE Colson | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
113 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
113 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
115 | HO Jacob | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
116 | CARL Ryan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
117 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
118 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
119 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
119 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
119 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
122 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
123 | ABDELLAHI Aziz | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
124 | SHANKAR Karthik | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
125 | KLEBS Robert | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | |
126 | FORT David | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
126 | STEVENS Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
128 | AN Damon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
129 | MCNEAR Chelan S. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
130 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 88% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
131 | ST.CLAIRE-KING Tenzin | 100% | 80% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
132 | LINDON Michael A. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
132 | COHEN Charlie | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
134 | CAMPBELL Tobias | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
134 | MORAN William | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
136 | YANG Joshua | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
137 | LUHMAN Gabriel | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
138 | BLOODWORTH Drake | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
138 | SHETTY VIVAN | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
140 | WHITE Blake | 100% | 41% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
141 | JUNG Edward | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
142 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
143 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 80% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
144 | HINTON Nickolys R. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
145 | LIU Yizhe | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
146 | FARIDI Imran | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
147 | PARK Caleb | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
147 | BEEM Noah | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
149 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
149 | BURGESS-LINDEN Ian | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
151 | HERRERA Aragon | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
151 | IDRIS Haashir | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
151 | CAMERON Dalton | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
151 | YEE Collin | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
155 | HUSTON Theodore | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
155 | HOLLOWAY Adam | 100% | 68% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.