Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 2 | CONG Anne | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | GONG Joy | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 4% | 28% | 48% | 21% | |
| 5 | KANG Ellie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 6 | FAN Alexandria | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 33% | 7% | |
| 7 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 8 | KAUL Tara | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 10 | FUNG Iris | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
| 11 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 12 | XIONG Alina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 13 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
| 14 | KWON Ava | - | - | 4% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 15 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 16 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 17 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 18 | LIN Elaine | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 19 | WANG Emily | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | < 1% |
| 20 | DHAR Rana | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | MEYERSON Michelle | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% | |
| 22 | WANG JiaQi | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | MISHEV Lila | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 24 | SUNG Isabella | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 25 | GAY Alexandra | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | KONZEN Iris | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | HILD Anya | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | PARK Haylie | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | NIU Jessica | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | ZHANG Olivia | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | BAK Milena | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | TONG Laurie | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | HU Heidi | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | MARGULIS Roxana | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | REN Katherine | 1% | 10% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | BODROVA Vidana | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 38% | |
| 41 | GONG suri | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 42 | KWON Hannah | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 43 | KOU Nicole | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | CHOI Charlotte | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Chloe | 23% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 49% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | VENNE Sophie | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | OLESKY Ellie | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | HUANG Pierra | 26% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | HWANG Sophie | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MELUL Michelle | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | LIU kai yin aria | 5% | 30% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | FAN Tina | 20% | 50% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | ZHU Avril | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | SEO Yunseo | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | BRIMMER Bella | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | KARAVAS Lucy | 50% | 42% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | BACKES Anastasia | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.