Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 2 | CONG Anne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 3 | GONG Joy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 21% | |
| 5 | KANG Ellie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 6 | FAN Alexandria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | 7% | |
| 7 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 8 | KAUL Tara | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | FOSS Persephone | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 22% |
| 10 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 11 | KU Alathea-Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 12 | XIONG Alina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | |
| 13 | SENGUPTA Jia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 14 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 15 | CASTELO Soleil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% | |
| 16 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 17 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 18 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 19 | WANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | < 1% |
| 20 | DHAR Rana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | MEYERSON Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 7% | |
| 22 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | MISHEV Lila | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
| 24 | SUNG Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 25 | GAY Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | KONZEN Iris | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 79% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | HILD Anya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 29 | PARK Haylie | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | NIU Jessica | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | ZHANG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 32 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 100% | 98% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | BAK Milena | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | TONG Laurie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | HU Heidi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | MARGULIS Roxana | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | REN Katherine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | BODROVA Vidana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
| 41 | GONG suri | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 42 | KWON Hannah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 43 | KOU Nicole | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | YOUNG Sienna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | VENNE Sophie | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | OLESKY Ellie | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | HUANG Pierra | 100% | 74% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | HWANG Sophie | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MELUL Michelle | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | LIU kai yin aria | 100% | 95% | 65% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | FAN Tina | 100% | 80% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | ZHU Avril | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | SEO Yunseo | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | BRIMMER Bella | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | KARAVAS Lucy | 100% | 50% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | BACKES Anastasia | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.