Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIAO Siwen | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 2 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 3 | SCOTT Eve | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | XIONG Haojiao | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 5 | LIM Jaslene | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 9% |
| 6 | DENG Brooke | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Ella | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
| 8 | MULAGARI Sadhika | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 9 | MUND Ruth | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 10 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 11 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 13 | ISBERG Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 14 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 15 | DAVIS Charlotte | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | TUNG Renee | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 19 | EVANS Madelynn | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 21 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 22 | DAI Olivia | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 22 | SPRINGER Ella | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 24 | FEIG Sela | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 25 | SCHICK Veronica | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | LIN Sarah | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | TODD Peregrine | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | SHEN Jamie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | FLATT Sophia | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | ROBINSON Stella | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 32 | NAYAK Anika | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 2% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | < 1% |
| 34 | MACDONALD Kaylie S. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 35 | NAYAK Indra | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 36 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 37 | HITOMI Nadya | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | BROWNER June | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BARTON Mele | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 39 | CHEN Kevy | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 41 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 42 | MORALES Victoria J. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | SU Emma | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 44 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 45 | SCHOEW Margot | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHENG Valentina | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | KNIGHT Skylar | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | LIN Nicole | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 49 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 50 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 51 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 52 | GRULICH Rayaana | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 53 | NAYAK Esha | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | CHARLES Caitlin | 4% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LI Victoria | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 56 | REGANTI Sitara | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | ATTIA Jasmine | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 58 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | - | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | YEN Natalie | - | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | MUELLER Amelia D. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 61 | HUANG Madeline | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 62 | FAN Grace | - | 2% | 11% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 63 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 64 | DUDNICK Morgan | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | HORAN Alexa | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 66 | WILSON Sophie | 43% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | FANG sophie | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 68 | NAYAK Mira | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 69 | SAWANT Asmi | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | LISSO Ria A. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% | |
| 71 | CHAN Kayla | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 73 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | ZARETSKY Arielle | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 75 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 76 | ZOLLER Noelle | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 77 | FREEDMAN Amelia F. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | BAROUCH Susanna | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | RODGERS Rachel | 16% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | MILLER Sophia | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | YAO Rainie | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 83 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | - | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 84 | CLEARY Mel | 4% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | LIM Jovine | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 86 | IYER Arushi | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 88 | WOODY Sophia | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | KEITH Margaret | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | HOLMES Sabrina | 6% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | EGAN Caroline | 12% | 32% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | TESTROET Aubrey | 28% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | COLBY Mercer | 2% | 14% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 94 | GERASIMOVA Valeria | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 95 | STRAYER Sofia I. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 95 | LABRECQUE Savannah | 27% | 40% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | CHOW Caitlyn | 57% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | LAZO Emily | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 99 | ERBSEN Sarah | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | HERMAN Sabrina | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 99 | RIESTERER Katherine | 35% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 102 | PREIMESBERGER Elaine | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 103 | WODISKA Ava | 20% | 51% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | HE Xin | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.