Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 2 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | XIONG Haojiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 5 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 6 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
| 8 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 9 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 10 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 11 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 12 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | ISBERG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 14 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 15 | DAVIS Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 17 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 19 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 24% |
| 21 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 22 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
| 22 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 24 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 25 | SCHICK Veronica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | LIN Sarah | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | TODD Peregrine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | SHEN Jamie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | ROBINSON Stella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 32 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | < 1% |
| 34 | MACDONALD Kaylie S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 35 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 36 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 37 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | BROWNER June | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 39 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 41 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 42 | MORALES Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 42 | SU Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 44 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 45 | SCHOEW Margot | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
| 48 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 49 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 50 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 51 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 52 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 53 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 53 | CHARLES Caitlin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LI Victoria | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 56 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 58 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | MUELLER Amelia D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 61 | HUANG Madeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 62 | FAN Grace | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
| 63 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 64 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | HORAN Alexa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 66 | WILSON Sophie | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | FANG sophie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | NAYAK Mira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | SAWANT Asmi | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
| 71 | CHAN Kayla | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 73 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | ZARETSKY Arielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 9% |
| 75 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 76 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 77 | FREEDMAN Amelia F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 77 | BAROUCH Susanna | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 79 | RODGERS Rachel | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | MILLER Sophia | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 83 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 100% | 100% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 84 | CLEARY Mel | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 85 | LIM Jovine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 86 | IYER Arushi | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 88 | WOODY Sophia | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | KEITH Margaret | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | HOLMES Sabrina | 100% | 94% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 90 | EGAN Caroline | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 90 | TESTROET Aubrey | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 94 | GERASIMOVA Valeria | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 95 | STRAYER Sofia I. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 95 | LABRECQUE Savannah | 100% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | CHOW Caitlyn | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | LAZO Emily | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 99 | ERBSEN Sarah | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | HERMAN Sabrina | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 99 | RIESTERER Katherine | 100% | 65% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 102 | PREIMESBERGER Elaine | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 103 | WODISKA Ava | 100% | 80% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | HE Xin | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.