Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
2 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% | |
3 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
3 | KIM Rachel | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
5 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 39% |
6 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
7 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
8 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
9 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 73% |
10 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
11 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
12 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
13 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
14 | XIE Lillian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
15 | YANG Audrey | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
16 | LI Han | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% | - |
17 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
18 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
19 | YANG Emma | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 40% | 7% |
20 | LAI Sophia | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
20 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
22 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
23 | FENG Grace | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 48% | 2% |
24 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 9% | |
25 | HSU Kaylin | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
26 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% | |
27 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
28 | REN Kayley | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
29 | YU Jane | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | YAN Noelle | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 36% | 8% |
31 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
32 | WYNN Kylie | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
33 | HO Addison | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 48% | 13% | |
34 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
35 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
36 | DENG Melissa | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
37 | WANG CAROL | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
38 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 45% | 8% |
39 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | 8% | 53% | 38% | 1% | |
40 | PAULUS Sloane | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
41 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
42 | PENG Charlotte | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 1% |
43 | LUO Miranda | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
44 | ZELDIN Nadia | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | LENK Sophie | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
46 | NIRGUDE Esha | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
46 | HAN Gian | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
48 | BROWN Lola | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | |
49 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
50 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | 5% | 44% | 49% | 1% | |
51 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 18% | 2% | |
52 | BING Charlotte | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - | |
53 | IQBAL Mariam | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
54 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
55 | KIM Chloe | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 1% |
56 | TAO Ann | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
57 | WANG Sunny | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
58 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
59 | CHERNYKH Elina | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
60 | VANMOORSEL Faye | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | WANG Joanna | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
62 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
63 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
64 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 1% | |
65 | ZOU Ella | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
66 | QUINTERO Camila | 3% | 42% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
67 | ZHANG Ivy | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
68 | ALKADI Mai | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
69 | DUAN Sophie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
70 | LIU Elinda | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | MARTIN Sloan | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
72 | KIM Sydney | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
73 | MCFARLANE Asha | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
74 | GAO Anne | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | - |
75 | BARTON Nanea | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 2% | - |
75 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
77 | COX Sophia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
78 | ZHANG Constance | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
79 | TAN Isabella | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
80 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
81 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
82 | WANG DINA C. | 3% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 3% | - | |
83 | LIN Yunong | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
84 | GUO Audrey | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
85 | LI savannah | 11% | 42% | 41% | 6% | - | - | |
86 | SHMUKLER Maria | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
87 | STONE Sydney | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
88 | AADHI Hansika | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
89 | TAN Dorathy | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
89 | WANG Amabel | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
91 | DAVID Lilou J. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
91 | JIN Sophia | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
91 | BULLARD Sydney | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
94 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
95 | BLAKEY Heaven | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
96 | CANO Sofia | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
97 | LEE Madeleine | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
98 | DESAI Esha | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
99 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | - |
100 | HAN Mia | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
101 | MENG Annabel | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
102 | FEDER Acadia | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
103 | WANG Selina | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
104 | MORSE Katherine | 7% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | |
105 | JIN Sophie | 39% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
106 | LIU Angelina | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
107 | CROMWELL Keira | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 1% |
108 | SAIFEE Zahra | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
109 | DESERANNO Seren | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
110 | CAO Kayla | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
110 | PIQUETTE Annika | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
110 | LI Xiang | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
113 | LI Joy | 16% | 48% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
114 | PEDERSEN Haley | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
115 | WU Elynna | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
116 | LI Olivia | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
117 | CHOI Sophie | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
118 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | 4% | 22% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
118 | LEE Allison | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
120 | THERON Zoe | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
121 | OS Danielle | < 1% | 10% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
121 | TULYAG Sayda | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
121 | UHLIG Natalie | 22% | 49% | 27% | 2% | - | - | |
124 | ZHANG Zoey | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
125 | CHEN Sophie | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
126 | JIN Amie | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
127 | ZHU Riley | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
128 | KIM Sophia | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
129 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | 8% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
130 | GOITIA Genevieve | 16% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
131 | WANG Emma | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
131 | DENG Claire | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
133 | RUSSELL Bowen | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
133 | KANG Marian | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.