Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NEELAM Navya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 9% |
| 2 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | LEE Gloria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 3 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 5 | XU Jessica | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 6 | HABEK Sophia | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 7 | TISMENSKY Avital | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 8 | QI Julieanne | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 9 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
| 10 | JORDAN Zoe | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% |
| 11 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 12 | FRANGER Macy | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 13 | TISMENSKY Abigail | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | CHERNIS Liah | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | WANG Cecilia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% | |
| 16 | KROPP Anne | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | LI Alice | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
| 18 | WONG Sydney | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 20 | VALDEZ Emma | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | KENT Laurel | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CHEN Alina | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | ZHANG Jane | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 24 | HALE Reagan | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | ZHONG Isabell | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KANE Alexa | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 27 | WORKNEH Lulit | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 28 | ZHAO Yanning | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | PEI Claire | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | PETROFF Eva | 3% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | SUREKA Krisha | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | STEMPKOVSKA Dina | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | WU Michelle | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 34 | OLUYOLE Isabella | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 37 | NAPOLI Eleanor | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | FU Shannon | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | VOSKOV Olivia | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHOI Arianna | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | PARK Lauren | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 43 | RICHARDSON Gianna | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 44 | SUN Karolyn | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 45 | TREPANIER Georgina | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 46 | JIANG chenxi | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | CHANG Allison | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 48 | WANG Aria | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | KUPPUSAMY Mahaa | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | YAO Chloe | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | KANE Charlotte | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MANDAP Alessandra | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 53 | DOBROSAVLJEVIĆ Kalina | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 54 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 55 | CHO Dana | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | KWON Kaylin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 57 | DENEALE Lucia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 58 | ZOGRAFOS Marina | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WU Jessica | - | 4% | 15% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
| 60 | HE Anna | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 62 | RAMEY Alexa | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 63 | KOSIM Irene | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DAI Chenxi | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 65 | WANG Chloe | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | SHEN Jiaxin | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 67 | YU Chloe | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 68 | WANG Nicole | - | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 69 | ZHAO Emma | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
| 70 | CARCELLER Bernardita | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | TORRES RAVELO Zoe | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 72 | CHON SUBIN | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | MIAO Anthea | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | HE Elsa | 30% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | KOU Cynthia | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.