Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NEELAM Navya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
| 2 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 3 | LEE Gloria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 3 | BOROTKO Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 5 | XU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 6 | HABEK Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 7 | TISMENSKY Avital | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 8 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 9 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 10 | JORDAN Zoe | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 12 | FRANGER Macy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 20% |
| 13 | TISMENSKY Abigail | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | CHERNIS Liah | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | WANG Cecilia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 16 | KROPP Anne | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | LI Alice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
| 18 | WONG Sydney | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 20 | VALDEZ Emma | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | KENT Laurel | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | ZHANG Jane | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 24 | HALE Reagan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | ZHONG Isabell | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KANE Alexa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 27 | WORKNEH Lulit | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 28 | ZHAO Yanning | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | PEI Claire | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 3% |
| 30 | PETROFF Eva | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | SUREKA Krisha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 32 | STEMPKOVSKA Dina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | WU Michelle | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 34 | OLUYOLE Isabella | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 37 | NAPOLI Eleanor | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | FU Shannon | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | VOSKOV Olivia | 100% | 89% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHOI Arianna | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | PARK Lauren | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 43 | RICHARDSON Gianna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 44 | SUN Karolyn | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | |
| 45 | TREPANIER Georgina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 12% | |
| 46 | JIANG chenxi | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | CHANG Allison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 48 | WANG Aria | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | KUPPUSAMY Mahaa | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | YAO Chloe | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | KANE Charlotte | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MANDAP Alessandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 8% |
| 53 | DOBROSAVLJEVIĆ Kalina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 54 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 55 | CHO Dana | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | KWON Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 57 | DENEALE Lucia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 58 | ZOGRAFOS Marina | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 81% | 52% | 22% | 4% |
| 60 | HE Anna | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 62 | RAMEY Alexa | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 63 | KOSIM Irene | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DAI Chenxi | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 65 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | SHEN Jiaxin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 67 | YU Chloe | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 68 | WANG Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 69 | ZHAO Emma | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 47% | 18% | 3% |
| 70 | CARCELLER Bernardita | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | TORRES RAVELO Zoe | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 72 | CHON SUBIN | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 73 | MIAO Anthea | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | HE Elsa | 100% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | KOU Cynthia | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.