Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TANI tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
2 | LIU Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
3 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
3 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% |
5 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
6 | BRIMMER Trey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
7 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
8 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
9 | ARISTOV Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
10 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
11 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
12 | WEI Rian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
13 | CAO Donald | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 8% | |
14 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
15 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
16 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
17 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
18 | JOHNSON Leland | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
19 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
20 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
21 | SO Morgan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
22 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
23 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
24 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
25 | KUMAR Avinash | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
26 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
27 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
28 | TATAR Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
29 | WANG Alex | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | GUAN Adam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | BOSITA Brennan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | KANTIPUDI Srihaas | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
33 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
34 | HU Harry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
35 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
36 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
36 | WANG Edward | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | TAYCHER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
39 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
40 | DANG Kainoa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
41 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
42 | WANG Haohua | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | MARTINSON Torm | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
44 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
45 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
46 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
47 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
48 | LIAO Sirui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
49 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
50 | SAGE Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
51 | KUSHKOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
52 | SO Dylan | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
53 | BURRES kenneth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
54 | FRANCOIS Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
55 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 89% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
57 | GRABOWSKI Alexander | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
58 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
59 | KOU Xiaoyi | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
60 | HO Alden | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | KANIA Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
62 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
63 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
64 | CROOKS Andrew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
65 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
66 | WONG Ron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
67 | LI Philip | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
68 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
69 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | |
70 | CHEN Boaz | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
71 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
72 | WANG David | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
73 | CHEN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
74 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
75 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
77 | LIN Alex | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
78 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 96% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
79 | ZHAO Aidan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
80 | BADMUS Joshua | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
81 | BURRES stuart | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
82 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
83 | NAFTALI Ori | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
84 | KAZMI Saif | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
84 | HOLMES Xavier | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
86 | SLAVNOV Anton | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
86 | XIONG Alvin | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
86 | YOUNG Parker | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
89 | KAUL Ishaan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
90 | ZHU Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
91 | SALMAN Ibrahim | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
92 | LIN Brendan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
93 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
94 | FLORES Mateo Pakal | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
95 | BELHE Hridhaan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
96 | FAVO Christopher | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.