Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
2 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
3 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
3 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
5 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
6 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
7 | ZENG Sarah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
8 | CHAN Jolene | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
9 | KINKADE Ellie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
10 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
11 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
12 | SHEARER Alena | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
13 | WEI JoyAnn | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
14 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
15 | MALEK Zolie | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
16 | WANG Callie | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
17 | MYAT Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
18 | FUNG Iris | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
19 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
20 | FENG Alicia G. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
21 | CHAN Madeleine V. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
22 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
23 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
24 | CHIANG Melissa | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
25 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
26 | HSU leah | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
27 | STONE Coral | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
28 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
29 | FAVO Isabella | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
30 | LEOU Korina | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
31 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% | |
32 | ZHAI AMY | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
33 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
34 | LIU Hannah | 7% | 31% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | KANG Ellie | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
36 | CROOKS Riley | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
37 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 12% |
38 | HU Anna | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
39 | BORGUETA Madison | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
40 | LUKER Hannah | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
41 | MANSPERGER Gia | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
42 | GOLDIN Nina | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
43 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
44 | SULLIVAN Madilyn R. | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
45 | WENG Amber | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
46 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
47 | DANTULURI Shalini | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
48 | XIONG Alina | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
49 | HILD Anya | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
50 | CONG Anne | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
51 | FOSS Persephone | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
52 | DHAR Layla | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
53 | MEYERSON Michelle | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
53 | HAN Emma | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
55 | GONG Joy | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
56 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
57 | CHEN Elaine | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
58 | GUGALA Hanna | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
59 | WANG JiaQi | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
60 | BUSH Bethany | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
61 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
62 | CASTELO Soleil | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
63 | DHAR Rana | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
64 | PARK Haylie | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
65 | NEMORIN Rei | 1% | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
66 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
67 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
68 | CHOI Charlotte | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
69 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
70 | DUCKETT Leighton | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
71 | LEE Irene | 9% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
72 | KORINTH Jacqueline | 1% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
73 | FAN Alexandria | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
74 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
75 | ZHANG Olivia | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
76 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | LEE Tammy | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
78 | KWON Hannah | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
79 | LIANG Claire | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
79 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
81 | MUNGUIA Mila | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
82 | GONG suri | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
83 | LEE Alyson | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
84 | SENGUPTA Jia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
85 | KIM Karen | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
86 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
87 | ZHU Avril | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
88 | LIN Annika | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
89 | WANG Jiayi | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
90 | JONES Veronica C. | 44% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
91 | NARAYANAN Sinduja | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
92 | KONZEN Iris | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
92 | SINGER Ellery | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
94 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
94 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
96 | BRACKEN SÁENZ Olive | 36% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
97 | ORIA Isabel | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
98 | SEO Yunseo | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
99 | GAN Shelby | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.