New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 2 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 3 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
| 3 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 5 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 6 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% | |
| 7 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 9% | |
| 8 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 9 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 10 | WAN Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
| 11 | HUTTENBACH Koren A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 12 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 13 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 14 | ANCONA Christopher | 100% | 99% | 83% | 36% | 7% | 1% | |
| 15 | WU Jerry | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 92% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 18 | BRINTON III Robert H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 19 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 5% | |
| 20 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 92% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 22 | BING Charles | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 23 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% | |
| 24 | YULDASHEV Timur | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
| 25 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 26 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | QI Steve | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | GALBAN Matthias L. | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | ROTHCHILD Matthew | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | ROCCABELLO Logan A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | VITKAUSKAS Justin G. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | STAFFA Bennet | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | PANDYA Poojan | 100% | 82% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.