University of Maryland, College Park Campus - Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FENG Leo | V D V V V D | V V V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 2 | LEE Justin | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | WOODWARD Connor | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 5 | JOHNSON Langston C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 6 | MARGULIES William | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | DE LA FUENTE Diego | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 8 | CORTEZ Christopher | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 9 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | V V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
| 10 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | CHAVES Matthew J. | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | LEE Aydan J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | FENKER William M. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | V D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 16 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 17 | MATT Chris | D V V V V D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 18 | SHANKAR Karthik | V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 19 | NG Jeremiah | D V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | WANG Nicolas | V D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 21 | ZHOU James Y. | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 22 | ZHOU Kevin | D V D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 23 | BAKER Keith L. | D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | LIN Felix | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | OTT Alexander | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | D D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 27 | GAUVEY Kieran | V V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | CLARK Keagan | D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 29 | ZHAO Anthony | D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 30 | PATRICK Timothy M. | D D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 31 | SRERE Mark A. | V D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 32 | OLIVER Isaac | D D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | KLEBS Robert | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 34 | LICHTERMAN Jakub | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | JENSBY Jason | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | NOVEY Eric | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 38 | FALVEY Brian | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 39 | MOLDABEK-MACHADO Aron | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.