New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
2 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
3 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
3 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
5 | LEE Derek J. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
6 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
7 | SHTEIN Yan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
8 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
9 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
10 | TASIKAS Stylianos | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
11 | MALONE Gregory D. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
12 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
13 | ZHENG Edward L. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
14 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
14 | DENG Andrew | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
16 | BAE Jason I. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
17 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
18 | KOVACH Jonah F. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | |
19 | RODE Leon J. | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
20 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
21 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
22 | KILGALLEN William | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
23 | LEONARD Charles | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
24 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
25 | WANG Robert | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
26 | HUANG Connor | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
27 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 6% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
28 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | WEBER Mattias A. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
30 | SIMMONS John M. | 11% | 38% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
31 | OH Triton | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
32 | SMINK Oliver | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
33 | TURCK Caspar J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
34 | MILLER Guy | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
35 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
36 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
37 | SAVOY Luca | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
38 | CHUANG Tristan | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
38 | CHENG Cody | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
40 | WITCZAK Mateus | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
41 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
42 | LIN Philip T. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
43 | SHINCHUK Daniel | < 1% | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
44 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
45 | DRUZHININ Michael | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
46 | MANGAN Daniel Marsh | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
47 | YUAN William | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.