Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BARNETTE Zoe | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 2 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
| 3 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 20% |
| 3 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 5 | HARFELD Skylar | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 6 | KEESING Liana | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | CHEN Kelly | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
| 10 | GORDON Rachel A. | - | 3% | 26% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 11 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 13 | LUCENTE Cynthia (Cyndi) C. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 14 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 15 | HU Amanda S. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 16 | SLACK Mary-Stuart F. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 18 | CHEN Lefu | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 20 | MCKEVITT Caitlin R. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CAPLIN Harriet R. | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 25% | 47% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | LAM Victoria M. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.