Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BARNETTE Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
2 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% |
3 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% |
3 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
5 | HARFELD Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% |
6 | KEESING Liana | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
7 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
8 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
9 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
10 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 20% | 2% |
11 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
12 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
13 | LUCENTE Cynthia (Cyndi) C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
14 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
15 | HU Amanda S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
16 | SLACK Mary-Stuart F. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
17 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
18 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
19 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
20 | MCKEVITT Caitlin R. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | CAPLIN Harriet R. | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
22 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 75% | 28% | 3% | - | - |
24 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.