Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CAMPBELL Daniel R. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
2 | LEE Timothy S. | V D V D V D | V V V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
3 | SNYDER IV William B. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
3 | YI Kyle | D V V D V D | V V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
5 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
6 | KIM Derek D. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
7 | SCHWARTZ Elliott | V V D V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
8 | KIM Ethan S. | D V D V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | SIELING Eric A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
10 | LEE Woosuk | V V V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
11 | YOON Nathan | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
12 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
13 | ADOLPHE Benjamin S. | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | ECKERT Kevin M. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
15 | CHEN Wesley | D V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
16 | TAE William G. | D D D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
17 | HITCHCOCK David | V V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
18 | TIRRELL Justin J. | V V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
19 | LIU John | V V V V D V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
20 | DOAN Joseph M. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
21 | YOON Sungho | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | RINEHART Conner M. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
23 | KIM Dohyun D. | V V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | TRAIN TIMOTHY | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
26 | PLUMER Jack E. | V V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
27 | SIMMS David | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
28 | TRAN Dai Long | V D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
29 | ADLER Ethan M. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
30 | CHAWLA Armaan | V D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
31 | MITCHUM Drew J | D D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
32 | SALISBURY Cary | D V V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
33 | WALTHER Bryan M. | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
34 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | V D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
35 | PICCUS Isaac S. | D V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
36 | EVANS Allen L. | V D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
37 | NOMANI Shibli D. | D D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
38 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | D D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
39 | BENKLER Yuriy | D D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
40 | MARKAS Justin W. | V V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
41 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | D D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
42 | SIMMS Daniel | V D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
43 | ROY NATHAN J | V D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
44 | STEVENS Daniel | D V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
45 | LI Benjamin | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
46 | DUDLEY Logan M. | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
47 | KIM Brad K. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
48 | ERDEK Michael | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
49 | CAMMETT William J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
50 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
51 | DE KLERK Ryan | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | SNYDER John W. | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
53 | HODGE Jaydon L. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
54 | BRAVO Drake X. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
55 | SHETE Smit | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
55 | HERMAN Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.