Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAMPBELL Daniel R. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 2 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 3 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | YI Kyle | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
| 6 | KIM Derek D. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 7 | SCHWARTZ Elliott | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | KIM Ethan S. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 9 | SIELING Eric A. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | LEE Woosuk | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% |
| 11 | YOON Nathan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 12 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 13 | ADOLPHE Benjamin S. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 14 | ECKERT Kevin M. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 15 | CHEN Wesley | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 16 | TAE William G. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 7% |
| 17 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 18 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | LIU John | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 20 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | YOON Sungho | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 23 | KIM Dohyun D. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 24 | TRAIN TIMOTHY | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 25 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 26 | PLUMER Jack E. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | SIMMS David | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 28 | TRAN Dai Long | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ADLER Ethan M. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | CHAWLA Armaan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MITCHUM Drew J | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | SALISBURY Cary | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 33 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PICCUS Isaac S. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | EVANS Allen L. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 37 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 38 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 39 | BENKLER Yuriy | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | MARKAS Justin W. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | SIMMS Daniel | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | ROY NATHAN J | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 44 | STEVENS Daniel | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | LI Benjamin | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | KIM Brad K. | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | ERDEK Michael | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | CAMMETT William J. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | DE KLERK Ryan | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SNYDER John W. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | BRAVO Drake X. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHETE Smit | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | HERMAN Nathan | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.