Bethany School - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOWELL Ryan L. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 2 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 19% | 49% | 30% | ||
| 3 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 42% |
| 3 | WONG Antonio | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 7% | |
| 5 | MCOWEN Peter D. | - | 3% | 26% | 47% | 24% | ||
| 6 | UPTON Craig | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 7 | BURTE Alexander J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 8 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 9 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 10 | GNEUHS Sam | 12% | 49% | 33% | 6% | - | ||
| 11 | LITTLE Kevin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 41% | 9% |
| 13 | BASSIK Eva | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 14 | DENMAN Matthew L. | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | PINKERTON Joseph H. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | MCLANE Katherine | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | ||
| 17 | MCCALLEN Cade | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 18 | SMITH Brandon T. | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | HIGGINS John | 21% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 21 | AMES Tucker | 51% | 40% | 9% | - | - | ||
| 22 | JACOBSON Leah | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | WESTFALL Iris | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | GERWE Ava | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.