The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HEDGES Philip S. | V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 2 | ZAYDMAN David M. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 3 | WILKENS Zach Q. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | WELDON Benjamin | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | AHMED Saheer | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 6 | MARIANI Lou | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | WATT Darren | D D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 8 | DOWDELL Riley | D D V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | ULINICH Alexander | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | NG Biwon | V V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 14 | COHEN Benjamin A. | V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 15 | DUONG Zoey | D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 16 | WHEELER Mark C. | D D D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 17 | HELGE James R. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | TONG Samuel | D V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 19 | SARKAR Anish | D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 20 | YUKELSON Michael | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 21 | KELLEY Thomas (TJ) J. | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 22 | KUO Michael | V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 23 | KONG Martin C. | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 24 | PRAKASH Hari | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | BECK Brian C. | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | CHANG Celine A. | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 27 | HOFMAN Haejung | D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 28 | KUO Rylan | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 29 | SIRBU Dan | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | HOOPES Jr. Richard R. | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | PERGERSON Cole | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | ENRILE Erica | V D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 33 | GU Aidan | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | CHENG Zijun | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | LOGUE Andrew E. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 36 | MADRID Maureen | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.