| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victories | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | 4 |
| Losses | 16 | 12 | - | - | - | 28 |
| Win Ratio | 11.1% | 14.3% | - | - | - | 12.5% |
| Pool Victories | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | 3 |
| Pool Losses | 13 | 10 | - | - | - | 23 |
| Pool Win Ratio | 13.3% | 9.1% | - | - | - | 11.5% |
| DE Victories | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
| DE Losses | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | 5 |
| DE Win Ratio | 0.0% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 16.7% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Easy wins† | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Easy wins as % of wins | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 0.0% |
| Close wins‡ | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Close wins as % of all wins | 50.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 25.0% |
| Close losses‡ | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | 4 |
| Close losses as % of all losses | 6.2% | 25.0% | - | - | - | 14.3% |
| Big losses† | 13 | 4 | - | - | - | 17 |
| Big losses as % of all losses | 81.2% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 60.7% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victories | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
| Victories as % of all victories | 0.0% | 50.0% | - | - | - | 25.0% |
| Losses | - | 3 | - | - | - | 3 |
| Losses as % of all losses | 0.0% | 25.0% | - | - | - | 10.7% |
| Total | - | 4 | - | - | - | 4 |
| Total as % of all bouts | 0.0% | 28.6% | - | - | - | 12.5% |
| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Events | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | 5 |
| Tournaments | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | 5 |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 2:5 | MARTIN devorah | 10 | U | 2 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | SHAW Guinevere L. | 3 | E25 | 8 | Worcester Fencing Club | ||||||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | BURK-LEAVER Erin | 9 | U | 6 | Denver Fencing Center | ||||||
| Pool | D | 2:5 | PEARSALL William | 4 | E25 | 9 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1896 | 751 | 12.3 | 8% | ||
| T16 | D | 1:15 | GLODE Russell | 7 | U | 3 | Seacoast Fencing Club | 1387 | 1364 | 201.3 | 49% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | V | 5:2 | HANSEN Jacob | 5 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 2500 | 708 | 199.0 | 5% | ||
| Pool | D | 1:5 | OMALLEY michael | 1 | U | 5 | Marx Fencing Academy | 696 | 907 | 138.8 | 62% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | WILLIAM Pearsall | 3 | U | 1 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1639 | 768 | 26.9 | 16% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:4 | MUMLEY Logan | 2 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 837 | 742 | 93.7 | 45% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | ANNEAR Phillip | 6 | U | 2 | RPI College Fencing Club | 840 | 835 | 84.5 | 50% | ||
| T8 | D | 5:15 | HANSEN Jacob | 5 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 2500 | 1420 | 55.8 | 17% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 0:5 | KROHN Daphne | 2 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | PEDEN Evelyn | 3 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | D | 4:5 | TENNAKOON Jess | 7 | U | 6 | |||||||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 5 | U | 2 | Worcester Fencing Club | 961 | 868 | 131.4 | 45% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | GOLDENBOGEN Simon | 1 | E25 | 1 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1655 | 737 | 28.3 | 9% | ||
| Pool | D | 1:5 | BILLINGS Viviana | 4 | U | 5 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| T8 | D | 1:15 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 5 | U | 2 | Worcester Fencing Club | 1229 | 1921 | 500.9 | 79% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 0:5 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 2 | U | 1 | Worcester Fencing Club | 1332 | 758 | 108.2 | 24% | ||
| Pool | D | 2:5 | BROSTEK Samuel | 1 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1730 | 650 | 41.2 | 9% | ||
| Pool | D | 4:5 | BURGESS Emerson | 6 | U | 5 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1587 | 608 | 49.0 | 15% | ||
| Pool | D | 1:5 | PEDEN Evelyn | 5 | U | 2 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | V | 5:3 | FREDETTE Otto | 4 | U | 5 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1545 | 559 | 308.4 | 12% | ||
| T8 | V | 10:6 | FREDETTE Otto | 4 | U | 5 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 2500 | 2500 | 420.5 | 50% | ||
| T4 | D | 0:10 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 2 | U | 1 | Worcester Fencing Club | 1218 | 2921 | 999.3 | 95% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 3:5 | BROSTEK Samuel | 6 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1124 | 2500 | 985.7 | 88% | ||
| Pool | D | 2:5 | BILLINGS Viviana | 7 | U | 3 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | D | 2:5 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 2 | U | 1 | Worcester Fencing Club | 874 | 1514 | 560.7 | 75% | ||
| Pool | D | 3:4 | OGRADY Quinn | 1 | U | 5 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | PEDEN Evelyn | 5 | U | 2 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | ||||||
| Pool | D | 2:5 | MERRIFOX Tavish | 4 | U | 6 | Vermont Fencing Alliance | 1105 | 954 | 195.7 | 44% | ||
| T8 | D | 7:10 | PEDEN Evelyn | 5 | U | 2 | Vermont Fencing Alliance |