2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 8 | 5 | - | - | - | 13 |
Losses | 6 | 15 | - | - | - | 21 |
Win Ratio | 57.1% | 25.0% | - | - | - | 38.2% |
Pool Victories | 6 | 4 | - | - | - | 10 |
Pool Losses | 4 | 12 | - | - | - | 16 |
Pool Win Ratio | 60.0% | 25.0% | - | - | - | 38.5% |
DE Victories | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | 3 |
DE Losses | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
DE Win Ratio | 50.0% | 25.0% | - | - | - | 37.5% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Easy wins† | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | 5 |
Easy wins as % of wins | 37.5% | 40.0% | - | - | - | 38.5% |
Close wins‡ | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
Close wins as % of all wins | 12.5% | 20.0% | - | - | - | 15.4% |
Close losses‡ | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
Close losses as % of all losses | 0.0% | 13.3% | - | - | - | 9.5% |
Big losses† | 3 | 6 | - | - | - | 9 |
Big losses as % of all losses | 50.0% | 40.0% | - | - | - | 42.9% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Victories as % of all victories | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 0.0% |
Losses | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
Losses as % of all losses | 0.0% | 6.7% | - | - | - | 4.8% |
Total | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
Total as % of all bouts | 0.0% | 5.0% | - | - | - | 2.9% |
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
Tournaments | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:1 | PALAMARCHUK Mia | 8 | U | 10 | New York Fencing Academy | 1095 | 1564 | 57.2 | 73% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | STAFFORD Thylane Sage | 5 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy | 862 | 1621 | 215.0 | 87% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | SIU Maximus | 1 | U | 3 | Elite Fencers Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 1:5 | LIU Brinley | 9 | U | 1 | Wanglei International Fencing Club | 1296 | 1407 | 103.2 | 57% | ||
T16 | W | 10:2 | LAI Jason Adrian | 6 | U | 9 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
T8 | L | 0:10 | LIU Brinley | 9 | U | 1 | Wanglei International Fencing Club | 1899 | 1643 | 250.3 | 38% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:3 | MASKIN Anna | 2 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Acadamy | 2500 | 1358 | 230.9 | 15% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | ZHANG Mason | 5 | U | 6 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | L | 2:5 | LIU Brinley | 4 | U | 1 | Wanglei International Fencing Club | 1461 | 1588 | 184.3 | 57% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | PALAMARCHUK Mia | 7 | U | 5 | New York Fencing Academy | 1451 | 1404 | 109.8 | 48% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | STAFFORD Thylane Sage | 3 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy | 894 | 1514 | 50.4 | 82% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | LAI Jason Adrian | 1 | U | 7 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
T8 | W | 10:3 | LAI Jason Adrian | 1 | U | 7 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
T4 | L | 5:10 | STAFFORD Thylane Sage | 3 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy | 1988 | 2079 | 436.4 | 54% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 1:4 | CHEUNG Harrison | 9 | U | 5 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | L | 1:5 | KHURGIN Sebastian | 7 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | L | 3:5 | CHEN Samuel | 2 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island | ||||||
T16 | L | 4:10 | WEILER Philip | 8 | U | 8 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:2 | ZHANG Mason | 2 | U | 9 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | L | 1:5 | CHO Angelina | 5 | U | 7 | New York Fencing Academy / Sallemazoo | 1049 | 1918 | 415.8 | 83% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | STAFFORD Thylane | 8 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Academy | 1704 | 1502 | 144.1 | 41% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | VILLER Gabriella | 4 | U | 6 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island | ||||||
Pool | L | 3:5 | UPWARD Conrad | 6 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island | ||||||
Pool | L | 2:5 | CHEUNG Daniel | 3 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island | ||||||
Pool | L | 2:5 | KHURGIN Sebastian | 9 | U | 1 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:1 | CHEN Samuel | 7 | U | 5 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island | ||||||
T16 | W | 10:8 | ZHANG Mason | 2 | U | 9 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
T8 | L | 2:10 | CHEUNG Daniel | 3 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 3:5 | KHURGIN Sebastian | 5 | U | 1 | New York Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:2 | CHO Angelina | 3 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Academy / Sallemazoo | 2079 | 2500 | 331.8 | 63% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | CHEUNG Daniel | 4 | U | 2 | New York Fencing Academy Long Island | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:0 | STAFFORD Thylane | 2 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Academy | 1604 | 2832 | 115.4 | 87% | ||
Pool | L | 1:5 | VILLER Gabriella | 6 | U | 5 | New York Fencing Academy / Sallemazoo | 1245 | 2947 | 1029.6 | 96% | ||
T8 | L | 8:10 | STAFFORD Thylane | 2 | U | 3 | New York Fencing Academy | 2500 | 2500 | 420.5 | 50% |