Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAVARRO Ava B. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 2 | SLACKMAN Valerie | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | ALDADAH Huda M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 3 | KIM Diane E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 5 | NI Emma | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
| 6 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | KULKARNI Diya | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 8 | LEE Olive | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 9 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 10 | LONG Cindy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 11 | YOON Julia J. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 12 | YEE-WADSWORTH Sofia L. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 3% |
| 13 | COBERT Helen G. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | SHI Angela L. | 16% | 42% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | LIN Julia L. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 16 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 17 | GILLIS Alexandra G. | - | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 18 | WILLIAMS Claudine S. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 19 | KANG Dahyun | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 20 | BENATER Lauren | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 22 | ZHAO Yingying | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | CHAN Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 24 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 24 | HUH Anna | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | TOLBA Salma | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | PYO Yunice | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 28 | SHAO Ariel | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | RABEL Brenna V. | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | YAO Jillian | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SMUK Daria A. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | SZEWC Alexandra | 1% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CORDERO Allison | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | ROWLAND May | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | MOK Chloe R. | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.