Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jinning | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 2 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | |
| 3 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 3 | THADHANI Elio | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 6 | XIAO Bowen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 7 | SUTARIA Julian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 8 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 9 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | AMRANI David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 11 | BAO Chris W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 12 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
| 13 | DOHONEY Tommy | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 15 | TAN Benjamine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | BANSAL Rahul | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 17 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 18 | COFFIN Carleton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 19 | KONDOR James | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | BALDWIN Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | CUTLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 23 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 26 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | FENG Michael | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | DALOMBA Kingston | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 32 | REN Bingye | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 33 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 36 | YANG David | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 37 | WANG Qiqi | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 38 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 7% | |
| 39 | HO Jor Sam | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 41 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | OLLARI John W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 43 | BROGAN Kevin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 44 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CRANE William | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | DANGELO Connor | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | YANG Samuel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 49 | WALSH Frederic | 100% | 97% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | WANG Yantao | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 51 | JIN Hin Hei | 100% | 96% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 52 | MENG Guangnan | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
| 53 | LOPES Ryan | 100% | 98% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 54 | BERGERON Justin | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.