Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DI TELLA Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 2 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
| 3 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 14% | |
| 3 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% | |
| 5 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 21% |
| 6 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 7 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 8 | BOUDREAU Justine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 9 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
| 10 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 11 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% | |
| 12 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 13 | HOPKINS Leila | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 15 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
| 16 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 17 | CALDWELL Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% |
| 18 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 19 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | 4% |
| 22 | BENNETT Olivia | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 23 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | BENZAN India | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 8% |
| 26 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | 1% |
| 27 | LI Suri | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 28 | LI Fei | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 30 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | BALSKUS Sophia | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | AMOROSO Elizabeth | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
| 34 | KELLY Diane A. | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | SONG Angela | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 36 | YING Julia Y. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 37 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | WEINSIER Ryan | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SIU Maple | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 41 | SHEIN Evita | 100% | 96% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 43 | HUANG Ziyan | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | ETZEL Rowan | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
| 48 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 86% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | SONG Jaeyi | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 100% | 97% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | SIU Hazel | 100% | 89% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LEE Hwaeun | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.