Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Daniel D. | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | LYU Victor | V D V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | LIU Patrick | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | WU Alexander | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 5 | LI Brandon H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 6 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | KLOSTERMANN Max | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 9 | LIN Richard W. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 10 | LI Richard | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | WELCH Kyle J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 12 | WU Nicholas | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 13 | LI Owen | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | UM Ethan A. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 16 | BING Charles | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 17 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | JIANG Owen | V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | DU Samuel R. | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | ZOBEL Eric H. | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | DAI Jonathan T. | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | GONG Benjamin | D V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 23 | DAUM Charlie | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V V D D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 24 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 26 | LIN James G. | V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 27 | HOWARD Michael | V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 28 | ACHILOV Sayid | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 30 | SHIN Joshua J. | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 31 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | LI Eric | D D V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 33 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 34 | ADLER David R. | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 35 | TSAI Max W. | V D V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 36 | MCLEAN Miles K. | V V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 37 | DESANDO Michael R. | V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 38 | LIU Jinning | V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 39 | DENG Kenny | V V V V D D | D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
| 40 | BREIER Matthew F. | D V V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 41 | MIALL Steven A. | D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 42 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 43 | MENG Zhaoyi | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 44 | TEMPLE Jackson | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 45 | BOLAÑOS CAMACHO Alejandro | D V D V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 46 | XIAO Anthony | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 46 | LIN Michael | V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 48 | WANG Mason | V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 49 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | D V D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 50 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 51 | POPESCU Tudor | D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 52 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 53 | BOUSSY Luciano | V D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 54 | ZHEN Ethan | D V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 55 | SIEGEL Elliot | D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 56 | CHAN Matthew | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 57 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | D D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 58 | BOOTHMAN Colby | D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 59 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 60 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | V D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 61 | LI Arvin | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 62 | LU Yikai | V D V D D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 63 | SHAO Eric | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 64 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 65 | SANTULLI Tristan | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 66 | AMRANI David | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 67 | LI Ayren | D V V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 68 | WILBERT Matt | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 69 | XU Ethan | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 70 | BORGAL Cameron | V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 71 | LIGH Thomas | V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 72 | DESOLA Aidan J. | D D D D V V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 73 | VO Jonathan | V D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 74 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 75 | ALIMI Yacine A. | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 76 | BARTRAM Carter H. | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 77 | CURTIS William K. | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 78 | ZHENG Harrison | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 79 | CUTLER Andrew | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 80 | CARPENTER Liam | D D V D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
| 81 | GNEUHS Sam | D V D D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 82 | WILSON Samuel S. | D V D D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 83 | BANSAL Rahul | D V D D D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 | |
| 84 | GARDINER Luke J. | D D V D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
| 85 | THADHANI Elio | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 86 | DREW Nicolas | D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 86 | WU Michael | D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 88 | WOHLERS Casey | D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 89 | MONTALBINE Aidan | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 89 | DOHONEY Tommy | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 89 | XIAO Bowen | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 92 | RIPA Joseph K. | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 93 | ABRUZZESE Owen | D D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 93 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 95 | BAO Chris W. | D D D D D D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | |
| 95 | EBERMAN Henry | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 97 | WOHLERS Trevor | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 97 | BISHOP Henry | D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.