Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Daniel D. | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% | |
2 | LYU Victor | - | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
3 | LIU Patrick | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 77% | |
3 | WU Alexander | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
5 | LI Brandon H. | - | - | - | - | 10% | 90% | |
6 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | |
7 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
8 | KLOSTERMANN Max | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 31% | |
9 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | - | - | 9% | 45% | 46% |
10 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
11 | WELCH Kyle J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
12 | WU Nicholas | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 52% | 30% |
13 | LI Owen | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 23% | |
14 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 5% | 30% | 60% | 5% | |
15 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 54% | |
16 | BING Charles | - | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | |
17 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% | |
18 | JIANG Owen | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
19 | DU Samuel R. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
20 | ZOBEL Eric H. | - | - | 4% | 26% | 51% | 19% | |
21 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 56% | 25% | |
22 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
23 | DAUM Charlie | 1% | 12% | 51% | 31% | 5% | - | |
24 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | - | 5% | 39% | 56% | |
24 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
26 | LIN James G. | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 52% | 10% | |
27 | HOWARD Michael | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
28 | ACHILOV Sayid | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% | |
29 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
30 | SHIN Joshua J. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
31 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 1% | 9% | 40% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | LI Eric | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 44% | 9% | |
33 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
34 | ADLER David R. | - | - | 6% | 33% | 44% | 17% | |
35 | TSAI Max W. | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
36 | MCLEAN Miles K. | - | 8% | 36% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | DESANDO Michael R. | - | - | 6% | 34% | 51% | 8% | |
38 | LIU Jinning | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | |
39 | DENG Kenny | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
40 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | |
41 | MIALL Steven A. | - | 4% | 25% | 49% | 20% | 1% | |
42 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | 2% | 22% | 50% | 24% | 3% | |
43 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 11% | 46% | 37% | 6% | - | |
44 | TEMPLE Jackson | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
45 | BOLAÑOS CAMACHO Alejandro | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
46 | XIAO Anthony | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 30% | 2% | |
46 | LIN Michael | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 31% | 2% | |
48 | WANG Mason | 1% | 13% | 43% | 34% | 8% | - | |
49 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 7% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | |
50 | MILLER Aidan A. | 3% | 23% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | |
51 | POPESCU Tudor | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
52 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 18% | 43% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
53 | BOUSSY Luciano | 4% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
54 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 5% | 40% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
55 | SIEGEL Elliot | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | |
56 | CHAN Matthew | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
57 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | - | 7% | 34% | 43% | 16% | |
58 | BOOTHMAN Colby | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
59 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | 7% | 38% | 45% | 10% | - | |
60 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | 9% | 42% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
61 | LI Arvin | 1% | 16% | 48% | 31% | 4% | - | |
62 | LU Yikai | - | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
63 | SHAO Eric | 4% | 31% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | |
64 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 2% | 35% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
65 | SANTULLI Tristan | - | 5% | 31% | 44% | 17% | 2% | |
66 | AMRANI David | 9% | 52% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
67 | LI Ayren | 24% | 52% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
68 | WILBERT Matt | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - | |
69 | XU Ethan | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
70 | BORGAL Cameron | 5% | 40% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
71 | LIGH Thomas | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
72 | DESOLA Aidan J. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 52% | 20% | 2% |
73 | VO Jonathan | 47% | 49% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
74 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 3% | 31% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
75 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
76 | BARTRAM Carter H. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
77 | CURTIS William K. | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - | |
78 | ZHENG Harrison | 31% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | CUTLER Andrew | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
80 | CARPENTER Liam | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
81 | GNEUHS Sam | 40% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
82 | WILSON Samuel S. | 40% | 50% | 9% | - | - | - | |
83 | BANSAL Rahul | 77% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
84 | GARDINER Luke J. | 21% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
85 | THADHANI Elio | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
86 | DREW Nicolas | 10% | 59% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | WU Michael | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
88 | WOHLERS Casey | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
89 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
89 | DOHONEY Tommy | 73% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
89 | XIAO Bowen | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
92 | RIPA Joseph K. | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
93 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 77% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
93 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 43% | 49% | 8% | - | - | - | |
95 | BAO Chris W. | 1% | 11% | 38% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
95 | EBERMAN Henry | 45% | 51% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
97 | WOHLERS Trevor | 47% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
97 | BISHOP Henry | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.