Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ALTHARDT Michael W. | - | - | 4% | 36% | 60% | |
| 2 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 3 | GREGORY Abram | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 3 | MENTELE Caden | 1% | 14% | 43% | 39% | 2% | |
| 5 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 6 | LAUER Michael | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
| 7 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% |
| 8 | RIPLEY Ian | 3% | 24% | 48% | 24% | 1% | |
| 9 | EROTAS Samuel | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 10 | ARMBRUSTER David | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | GUILFORD Corey | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 14 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 3% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% | |
| 15 | SHOU Phillip | 39% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | MILLER Jackson | 5% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 17 | ORGAN Jason | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | ORGAN Drew | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | STOCK Olivia | 8% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 20 | NGUYEN Tran N. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 21 | SPURGEON William | 9% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.