Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% |
| 2 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 3 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 18% |
| 3 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 5 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 7% |
| 6 | WU Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
| 7 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 25% |
| 8 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 25% |
| 9 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% |
| 10 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 41% | 5% |
| 11 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% |
| 12 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
| 13 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 14 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | BOOTHMAN Colby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 16 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 18 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 19 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 4% | - |
| 20 | BENTLEY Nick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 23 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 24 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% |
| 26 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 27 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 29 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 31 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 32 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 93% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 86% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | DALOMBA Kingston | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 38 | SOLOPOULOS James | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BERGERON Justin | 100% | 96% | 58% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 41 | FENG Michael | 100% | 86% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | BROGAN Kevin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | WANG Qiqi | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | DANGELO Connor | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | KIMBALL Curtis | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | HILL David E. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | SHALES Henry Amos | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.