Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DERSHWITZ Eli R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | |
| 2 | JI Cody Walter | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 3 | SMITH Jared C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 3 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 5 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | |
| 6 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 7 | BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% | |
| 8 | BOLTON Braydon A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% | |
| 9 | TE VELDE Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 10 | COHEN Josef A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 11 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 12 | SO Hananiah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
| 14 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 15 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 16 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 18 | SKEETE Kamar A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 19 | ATTIG Will T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 20 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 21 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 22 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | POPE Nico | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 26 | KIM Stephen E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 27 | XU William | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SOHN Kevin J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 30 | ARMIJO Gabriel K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% | |
| 31 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | - | |
| 32 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | LINDER James (Luke) L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | ||
| 34 | LIMB Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 35 | RAI Avin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 36 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 37 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | LO Joshua H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 41 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 42 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 39% | |
| 42 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 44 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% | |
| 45 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | WU Mengke | 100% | 89% | 49% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 48 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 49 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | BOOTH Zaheer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 52 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 53 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 54 | LEE Justin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 55 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% | - | |
| 56 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | TANN Justin | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 58 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | FENG Leo | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 61 | DENNER Lysander H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 62 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 63 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 65 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 67 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | WALKER Dalton F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 14% | ||
| 71 | ZHOU Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 72 | HJERPE Wade H. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 73 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | - | |
| 75 | LIU kelly | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 76 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | NIL Michael Y. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 79 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 80 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 81 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 83 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 85 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 86 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 93% | 59% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 87 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | ||
| 88 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 89 | MEHTA Sachin N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
| 90 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 91 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 95% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 92 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 93 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | ERMAKOV Lev | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 95 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 96 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 96 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 100 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 101 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 102 | YUN Jake | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 103 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.