Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 2 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% | |
| 3 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 3 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
| 5 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | |
| 6 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 7 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | ||
| 8 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 9 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% | |
| 10 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 12 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 13 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 14 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 15 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | ||
| 16 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
| 19 | PALEO Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | |
| 19 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 21 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 22 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | ||
| 23 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | ||
| 24 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 15% |
| 25 | LIU Zhi Jun | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 27 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 28 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 30 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | LI Angela | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | ZHAO Emily W. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 36 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 37 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 5% |
| 40 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 41 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | REN Xinling | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | MACE Eliza M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 45 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | ||
| 46 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | ||
| 47 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 48 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 49 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 51 | LI Alexis | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | WU Lanting | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 53 | LIM Jovine | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 54 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LO JOCELYN | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | ||
| 60 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 61 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 62 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | LIN Sarah | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 65 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 66 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 67 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 68 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 69 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 70 | YAN Lena | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | LIU Sumin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
| 72 | WUNNAVA Elina | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 74 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 75 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 76 | MUELLER Amelia D. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 77 | TRUBEY Elise | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 78 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | ||
| 79 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | ||
| 80 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 81 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 82 | NAYAK Mira | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 83 | LI Victoria | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 85 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 86 | ROBINSON Emerald | 100% | 75% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 79% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 89 | SCHICK Veronica | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 90 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 91 | CHEN Yuhan (Daisy) | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 92 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 93 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 100% | 48% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.