Internatonal Fencers Alliance of Dallas (IFAD) - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
2 | THOMAS Harris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
3 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | |
3 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
5 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
6 | ODEN Isaac M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
7 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
8 | SURESH Neeraj | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
9 | POS Theo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
10 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
11 | GUNDA Saketh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 10% | |
12 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
13 | RUNGE Patrick A. | 100% | 93% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
14 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
15 | JIANG Raymond | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
16 | HESSE Hans | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
17 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
18 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
19 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | YANG Zeph | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
22 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
23 | MA Benjamin | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
24 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
25 | GANDARA Andrew | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.