Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BRATTON Jack S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 16% |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% |
| 3 | LI Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 4% |
| 5 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 6 | COLON Cesar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 7 | CANNON Caiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | |
| 8 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 9 | BARLETTA Joseph | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | 12% | |
| 10 | HAY Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 8% |
| 11 | PETREE Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% |
| 12 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 13 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 29% |
| 14 | HAINES Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 5% |
| 15 | JACOBS Tyler M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
| 16 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | BOLTON Lucas R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
| 18 | RYAN Connor Q. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | FREEMAN Paris | 100% | 99% | 81% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 20 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | 100% | 64% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 7% | |
| 22 | WATERS Will T. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 22 | ANDERSON David C. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | GUTIERREZ Jose J. | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | TAYLOR Nolan J. | 100% | 88% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SZELA Tom J. | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 28 | WHITE-ROY Nolan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | RYAN Ben | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | OBERYSZYN Evan | 100% | 86% | 31% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SCHECHTER Nathan L. | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 100% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BOLD Timothy | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.