January NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Friday, January 7, 2022 at 8:00 AM

San Jose, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BOTELLO Natalia - - - 3% 18% 45% 34%
2 LEE Alexandra B. - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
3 STONE Anne-Elizabeth - - - 1% 9% 36% 53%
3 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. - - - 3% 19% 49% 28%
5 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 16%
6 JOHNSON Honor - - - 1% 6% 33% 60%
7 KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora - - 2% 10% 30% 39% 18%
8 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
9 LINDER Kara E. - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 33%
10 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. - - 2% 15% 38% 36% 8%
11 OLSEN Natalie J. - 5% 27% 41% 23% 5% -
12 GUTHIKONDA Nithya - 3% 18% 39% 31% 9% 1%
13 LU Vivian Y. - 1% 5% 22% 42% 31%
14 YUN Joy - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 10%
15 LI Amanda C. 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 7%
16 ADYNSKI Gillian I. - - 1% 9% 28% 40% 21%
17 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda - - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
18 CARVALHO Isabela A. 1% 9% 27% 37% 21% 4%
19 BURKE Nora S. - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
20 PAK Kaitlyn - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
21 BENTOLILA Esther - 2% 12% 32% 36% 17% 2%
22 GHAYALOD reya 8% 27% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
23 KIM Zoe - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
24 MIKA Veronica 2% 16% 34% 32% 14% 2%
25 LIN Audrey J. 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
26 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. - - 2% 9% 26% 39% 24%
26 GORDON Tamar 1% 7% 21% 33% 26% 10% 1%
28 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. - - - 1% 9% 36% 55%
29 MARSEE Samantha 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
30 MOYA Keona L. - 1% 6% 26% 41% 23% 3%
31 ANDRES Charmaine G. - 4% 17% 32% 30% 13% 2%
32 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
33 KRASTEV Minna 1% 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% < 1%
34 BOIS Adele - 3% 15% 32% 34% 15% 1%
35 MOZHAEVA MARIA 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
36 GREENBAUM Atara R. - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
37 HILD Nisha 1% 9% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
38 PAUL Lila 2% 12% 28% 32% 20% 6% 1%
39 JULIEN Michelle - 4% 20% 37% 28% 9% 1%
40 TONG Kunling - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 6%
41 JENKINS Ryan J. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
42 TZOU Alexandra - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
43 FOUR-GARCIA Madison - 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 3%
43 WILLIAMS Chloe C. - - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
43 BEVACQUA Aria F. 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
46 CHIOLDI Mina 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
47 CAO Stephanie X. - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 2%
48 GHOSH Priyanka 1% 7% 21% 33% 26% 10% 2%
49 KOVACS Sophia - 1% 10% 32% 39% 17% 2%
50 TAO Hannah J. - 5% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2%
51 MILLER Sky - - 2% 10% 27% 39% 22%
52 HANADARI-LEVY Amit - 2% 13% 31% 35% 16% 2%
53 HARRILL Gillian N. - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
54 THEODORE Maria A. - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
55 LACSON Sarah 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
56 FREEDMAN Janna N. - 4% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1%
57 CHANG Emily 4% 20% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
58 HONE Katarina G. 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
59 SZETO Chloe 1% 12% 33% 36% 16% 2%
60 PRIEUR Lauren 9% 31% 36% 19% 4% -
61 JUNG Irene 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% - -
62 GREENBAUM Ella K. 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2% -
63 HWANG Gabriela M. 6% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
64 SADIK HANA 19% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
65 BRIND'AMOUR Pamela 1% 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
66 YONG Erika E. 1% 8% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
67 ANGLADE Alexis C. - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 22%
68 YODER Bridget H. 6% 24% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
69 STONE Hava S. 5% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
70 CALLAHAN Chase J. 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
71 FEARNS Zara A. 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
72 SAYLES Nina R. 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
73 DELSOIN Chelsea C. 1% 7% 21% 33% 27% 10% 1%
74 CODY Alexandra C. 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% -
75 POSSICK Lola P. - 1% 6% 20% 36% 29% 8%
76 GUZMAN Mariana M. 3% 16% 31% 30% 16% 4% -
77 WU Erica L. 4% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
78 GORMAN Victoria M. 3% 17% 31% 30% 15% 4% -
79 VESTEL Mira B. 1% 7% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2%
80 NEIBART Fiona 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
81 TIMOFEYEV Daniella - - 2% 12% 34% 38% 14%
82 JOHNSON Lauren 1% 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% -
82 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. 31% 46% 19% 3% - - -
84 KER Grace 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 7% 1%
85 LIANG Megan - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
86 NEWELL Alexia C. 6% 23% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
87 HARRISON Imogen N. - 2% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
88 BLUM Leah I. 1% 6% 23% 37% 27% 6%
89 OISHI Megumi - 1% 7% 23% 37% 27% 6%
90 KIM Catherine 1% 6% 19% 33% 28% 12% 2%
91 HURST Kennedy 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
92 FANG Victoria W. 11% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
93 BILILIES Sophia 24% 46% 24% 5% 1% - -
94 ENDO Miyuki N. 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2% -
95 ANDRES Katherine A. - 2% 13% 31% 36% 17% 1%
96 NYSTROM Sofia C. 14% 35% 33% 14% 3% - -
97 BALAKUMARAN Maya 17% 37% 31% 12% 3% - -
98 LI Victoria J. 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4% -
98 CHIANG Emily 19% 42% 30% 8% 1% - -
100 CHING Sapphira S. 3% 15% 30% 31% 17% 4% -
100 CHIN Erika J. - 3% 13% 31% 35% 16% 2%
100 YANG Angelina LeLe 6% 24% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
103 DEPEW Charlotte R. 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
104 KALRA Himani V. 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
105 DRAGON Rainer 3% 17% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
106 CHEN Jane 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
107 PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
107 BUHAY Rachel T. 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% -
109 WANG Elysia 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
110 KYNETT Kathryn G. 4% 17% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
111 HE Charlotte - 5% 29% 41% 20% 4% -
112 XU Ellen 2% 14% 33% 33% 14% 3% -
113 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
114 CHIN Sophia J. 12% 31% 33% 18% 5% 1% -
115 GLUCK Myriam 45% 44% 10% 1% - - -
116 SHEA Erin - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
117 HOLMES Emma 34% 42% 20% 4% - - -
118 SINHA Anika 24% 39% 26% 9% 2% - -
119 ERIKSON Kira R. 17% 41% 32% 9% 1% - -
120 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
121 BAKER Audrey C. 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
122 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. 29% 52% 17% 2% - - -
123 ARNECKE Lauren A. 36% 45% 16% 2% - - -
124 WU Zoe 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
125 CHEN Xinyan 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
125 SUN Alyssa 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
127 DEMING Clare L. 13% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
127 BENOIT Adelaide L. 14% 39% 35% 11% 1% - -
129 DUNLAP Allison N. 25% 44% 24% 6% 1% - -
129 NGUYEN Thi 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.