San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
2 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
3 | FAGAN Margaret | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% |
3 | PANYI Maria | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
5 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
6 | BASSIK Judith M. | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
7 | MORRISON Monica L. | 1% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
8 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 27% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
9 | VASHISHT Suparna | - | 3% | 24% | 46% | 24% | 3% |
10 | DREYER Nadia S. | 2% | 16% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - |
11 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
12 | OSTERBAUER Nancy K. | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.