San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
2 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
3 | FAGAN Margaret | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 16% |
3 | PANYI Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
5 | CARTER Jane P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
6 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
7 | MORRISON Monica L. | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
8 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 73% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
9 | VASHISHT Suparna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 27% | 3% |
10 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% | 6% | - |
11 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
12 | OSTERBAUER Nancy K. | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.