San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
| 2 | LEONARD Ariane | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | WASHINGTON Isis | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 5 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 6 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 7 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 8 | BASSA Francesca A. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
| 9 | ISERT Sarah | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | KOMAR Sofia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 38% | 8% |
| 11 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 12 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 57% |
| 13 | NING Emma | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 15 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | WANG Elizabeth | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 17 | MEHROTRA Anya | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 40% | 39% |
| 19 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
| 20 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 21 | GAVRIELKO Nicole | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 46% | 12% |
| 22 | CHIN Isabella | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 22 | XIAO Ruien | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 24 | FALLON Kyle R. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 26 | GU Sarah | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 27 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
| 28 | HU Grace | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 29 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 31 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WATRALL Christina | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 33 | TOBY Natalia R. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
| 34 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 5% |
| 35 | WANG Karen | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 36 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 37 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | CHU Audrey | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 39 | CEBULA Anne | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 17% |
| 40 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 41 | CHORNIY Kateryna | - | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 40% | 26% |
| 42 | MCLANE Lauren | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 44 | XUAN Nicole J. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 45 | BEI Karen | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 2% |
| 46 | MAO Amy | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | NI Emma | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 49 | PATURU Meghana | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 50 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 51 | LIU Christina A. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 52 | LEE Michelle J. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
| 53 | WEBER Nora | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 54 | LUO Ashley | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 4% |
| 56 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 56 | RUEDA Rylie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 58 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 58 | LEE Sumin | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 60 | DOUGLAS Elizabeth (Liz) L. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | LU Junyao | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 62 | DESAI Meera P. | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | SZEWC Alexandra | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | WU Amelia | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 67 | LEUNG Natalie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 68 | GAO Judy | 13% | 33% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | WANG Nora | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 70 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | PARKER Allegra H. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 72 | LIN Waiyuk | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 73 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 75 | RATH Lauren N. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | BOUDREAU Justine | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 78 | ZHENG Evelyn | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 79 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 80 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 81 | VERA Kalista R. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 82 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 83 | LAWSON Marie A. | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 84 | VAN MARION Kirsten C. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | WELLS Tessa M. | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 86 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | SUN Renee R. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 88 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 89 | CHEN Lefu | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 90 | TYLER Syd | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 91 | WEISS Talia L. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 91 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 8% |
| 93 | DONDISCH Sophia | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 94 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 95 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 96 | KAIN Isabel J. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 97 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 98 | PAN Michelle | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | REID Anousheh | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 100 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 101 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 101 | KIM Jayna | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 103 | KETKAR Mallika | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 104 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 105 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 106 | LONADIER Keira | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 107 | SEMIKIN Julia | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 107 | WONG Alexandra R. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 110 | REID Sobia | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 110 | MING Cynthia | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 112 | FELAND Alexandra | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 113 | YIN Julia | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 114 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 115 | LEE Natasha | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 116 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 3% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 116 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | KIM Zoe L. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 119 | LEE Olive | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 120 | SMIK Leonie A. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 121 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 122 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 123 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 124 | SHEN Stephanie | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 125 | KALE Anika A. | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 126 | LAN Alice S. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 127 | MILLER Veronica | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 128 | LI Charlotte | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 130 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 131 | BARBARA Camille | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 132 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 133 | LI Alisha | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 134 | UYANIK Nerine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 135 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 136 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 137 | JOBALIA Ria | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 137 | HUELLAS-BRUSKIEWICZ Marie-Rose R. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.