Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | TAQI Ahmad F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | PEDERSEN Trevor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 5 | CANNON Caiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
| 6 | SPEVAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% |
| 7 | BRATTON Jack S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 8 | BARLETTA Joseph | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 9 | HERGAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 10 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 98% | 71% | 26% | 3% | |
| 11 | ANDERSON David C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 2% |
| 12 | HAY Gavin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 13 | JACOBS Tyler M. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Simon A. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | ROBINSON Keegan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 16 | WATERS Will T. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 17 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 18 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | CHITU Julian S. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 20 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
| 21 | MAHDI Mahdi | 100% | 98% | 73% | 27% | 3% | |
| 22 | PETREE Justin | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 23 | FREEMAN Paris | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 24 | WHITE-ROY Nolan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | RYAN Connor Q. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | GU Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 84% | 41% | 6% | |
| 28 | ROAT Kyle A. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ANEZ Daniel A. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 30 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | GHAZALI Omer | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | HAINES Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 34 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.