Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Joey | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | MULCAHY Sebastian | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 44% | 6% |
| 3 | CARCELLER Jeremias | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 5 | RONG Gordon | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 6 | RAHMAN Ali | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 7 | CHIEN Ian | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 8 | TANG Zheng | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | HUANG Yidong Allen | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 10 | BO Genero | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 11 | ROBERTS Arthur | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 12 | QU RuiTing | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 13 | OBERDERFER Viktor | 2% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 14 | WU Nathan | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | NGUYEN Ethan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 16 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 17 | DAI Chengwen | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | < 1% |
| 18 | HAN Eric | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
| 19 | JAMES Kaden | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 20 | WONG Alexander | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 21 | SHIH Derek | 2% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | SHOURIE Neel | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHEN Aiden | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | RONG Marcus | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 26 | LI Ryan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 27 | KIM Evan | 28% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | ROMAN Anton | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | KIM Lucas | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | XUE Michael | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 31 | FERRIERE Theo | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | SHOURIE Seth | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LI Stephen | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | MA kevin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 35 | ARMSTRONG Hendry | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | LIU Alrik SiWei | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | LUO Alvin Y. | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 38 | MOSLEY Wally | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 39 | MILLIKAN Aaron | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | DU Evan | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 41 | DING Max | < 1% | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 42 | WANG Lucas | 1% | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.