Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
2 | MULCAHY Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
3 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 6% |
3 | CARCELLER Jeremias | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
5 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
6 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
7 | CHIEN Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
8 | TANG Zheng | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
9 | HUANG Yidong Allen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
10 | BO Genero | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
11 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
12 | QU RuiTing | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
13 | OBERDERFER Viktor | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
14 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
15 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
16 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 7% |
17 | DAI Chengwen | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | < 1% |
18 | HAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 31% |
19 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
20 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 12% |
21 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
22 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - |
23 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
24 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
25 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
26 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
27 | KIM Evan | 100% | 72% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
28 | ROMAN Anton | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
29 | KIM Lucas | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
31 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
32 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 47% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | LI Stephen | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
34 | MA kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
35 | ARMSTRONG Hendry | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
36 | LIU Alrik SiWei | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
37 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
38 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
39 | MILLIKAN Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
40 | DU Evan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
41 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
42 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.