Southwest Recreation Center - gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
2 | GORIUNOV Ivan A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
3 | BRACELIS Josias L. | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 31% | 4% | |
3 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 2% |
5 | THAYER Bryce | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
6 | RUSSANOV Dennis | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
7 | LEE Seungwon | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
8 | ARANA Abraham | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
9 | KOSSMANN Alexander | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 27% | 4% | |
10 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
11 | IRWIN Peter | - | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
12 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
13 | DINKINS Shuayb | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 45% | 15% | |
14 | ZHOU Alec Q. | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 39% | 10% | |
15 | AKINS Winston B. | - | - | 3% | 26% | 49% | 22% | |
16 | LEADBETTER Gordon | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
17 | LANGENDERFER Braeden | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
18 | LEWIS Jared | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
19 | CHENG Ava | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
20 | DAVIS Jonah | - | - | 3% | 26% | 58% | 13% | - |
21 | EVANS Grant | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 1% |
22 | FREY Wayne N. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 43% | 18% | |
23 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 31% | 3% | |
24 | ANDREA Nathan T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% | |
24 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 62% | 13% |
27 | PROVATAS Eustratios | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 51% | 10% |
28 | HANDBERG Paul | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
29 | DULISSE ALeX | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% | |
30 | CHENG Thomas | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
31 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 1% | 15% | 51% | 28% | 5% | - | |
32 | YACCINO Nino | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
33 | KOSSMANN Raymond | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
34 | COVERT Benjamin | - | 14% | 51% | 29% | 5% | - | |
35 | LOUIS David | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
36 | BAKSA Frances E. | 3% | 30% | 44% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
37 | LIU Kevin | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
38 | DUPREE Thomas | 2% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
39 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 9% | |
40 | LE Kevin | 9% | 45% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
41 | WOLF Christopher | 4% | 38% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | |
42 | WILFORD Madigan | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
43 | HEINZE Luke H. | 1% | 26% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | |
44 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
45 | MIHALIK Alva | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | FREEMAN Zachary | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
47 | GASPAR Paula | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
48 | PETERS Micah | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
48 | MCCREARY Madeleine | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
50 | MARIN Lucas | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
51 | SAN JUAN Carlos | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 37% | 10% | |
52 | COMER John | 14% | 45% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
53 | SANCHEZ Carlos | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
54 | ROZET Alice | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
55 | CULLEN Reilly | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
56 | MCFARLAND John G. | 2% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | |
57 | RILEY Grace | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | LIU Nick | 21% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | KOKA Ashwin | 3% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
60 | BEASLEY Emma | 25% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
61 | DE SOLO Elizabeth | 39% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
62 | SANDERS Charlotte | 1% | 18% | 48% | 30% | 3% | - | - |
62 | RIGGINS James | 7% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
64 | MIA Raj | 22% | 68% | 10% | - | - | - | |
66 | FORTIER Adriana | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
67 | RASSEL John | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
67 | TANGUAY Brooke | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
69 | DINKINS Adam | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
69 | RODA Thaleia | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.